insideMAN

  • Who we are
  • Men’s Insights
  • Men’s Issues
  • Men’s Interests
  • About Men

Learning from the Chinese will help us stop Muslims, Jews, Africans and Americans circumcising men and boys

July 29, 2014 by Inside MAN 6 Comments

Eran Sadeh is a Jewish Israeli father who broke with cultural conventions by refusing to have his son circumcised. Here he explains how we must learn from the Chinese if we want to stop male circumcision being seen as “normal” in circumcising cultures and communities such as Muslims, Jews, North Americans and Africans. 

Nine years ago when my son was born I wasn’t debating whether to circumcise him or not. The thought of not circumcising did not even cross my mind. I did feel a strong resentment, though. I hated the feeling that I’m doing this against my will, just because it is a cultural dictate. And of course I recoiled from the idea that my son’s penis would look weird. In fact, I had no idea how an intact penis looked like.

Three things saved my son from the knife:

  • information against circumcision which I stumbled upon online
  • an online forum, where parents and activists offered support and shared their experience
  • and the third thing was Ronit Tamir

Ronit has a 15 year old intact son and since the year 2000 she organizes meetings between parents who did not circumcise their sons and parents who debate whether to do it or not. Until I met Ronit, the idea of not circumcising felt virtual, because it was confined to information and people I found on the internet. Meeting Ronit in person was a great leap for me that helped me to finalize my decision.

Our families told us it was wrong to leave our son’s penis intact

However, the fear that I’m making my son a freak did not die so quickly. Two months later my wife and I went to a meeting Ronit organized, where we met several couples who did not circumcise their sons. It was very reassuring for me to hear their stories; to learn that their sons were not being bullied for having an intact penis, and that this issue was a non-issue.

Our families did not like our decision to leave our son intact. They told us that what we are doing is wrong for our son, that he would hate us when he grows up, that circumcision is healthy and that an uncircumcised penis is disgusting, and that there are some things that you simply do, period.

So, how do we change a social norm that has such strong religious, historical and cultural roots? I suggest we take a good look at the successful campaign to end footbinding in China.

Footbinding afflicted most Chinese women for a thousand years, from the 10th century to the 20th century. During the 17th century the Manchu emperors tried to abolish footbinding by issuing edicts forbidding the practice, but their efforts failed entirely despite intimidating penalties.

The similarities between footbinding and circumcision are as follows:

  • Both are an ethnic marker
  • Both customs are practised by parents on children
  • Both customs are defended and supported by parents
  • Both are perceived by the parents as culturally mandatory
  • Both are perceived as a prerequisite for marriage or love life
  • Both are self-enforced by social pressure, by fear of shame
  • Both are believed to promote health and defined as aesthetically pleasing compared with the natural alternative
  • In the communities where they are practiced, they are nearly universal, persistent and practiced even by those who oppose them.

The successful campaign to end footbinding started in China at the end of the 19th century, and two decades later the custom was virtually ended. The campaign was comprised of three elements:

  • Explaining that the rest of the world did not bind women’s feet and that China was losing face in the world and was subject to international ridicule
  • Education about the advantages of natural feet and the disadvantages of bound feet
  • Forming natural-foot groups whose members pledged not to bind their daughter’s feet and not let their sons marry women with bound feet

Two very important principles guided the anti-footbinding activists:

  • Respect for the parents. They understood that mothers bound the feet of their daughters not because they are evil but rather they are motivated by a strong desire to guarantee marriage prospects of their daughters.
  • A law cannot by itself change a deeply rooted social norm. They understood that the change must come from within the community, by forming small groups all over the country.

I think that the combination of these elements should be a blueprint for our efforts as well.

Eran Sadeh campaigns for all children to enjoy the right to genital autonomy and he runs the website Protect the Child—Gonnen Al Hayeled. The content of this article is taken from a talk that Eran presented at Genital Autonomy 2014.   

—Photo credit: flickr/epSos.de

f you liked this article and want to read more, follow us on Twitter @insideMANmag and Facebook

Also on insideMAN:
  • Gaza: why does it concern us more when women and children die?
  • Male graduates caught in gender employment gap
  • Should we allow gender politics to be taught in UK schools
  • Eight things that fight club taught us about masculinity
  • Are boys seen as a problem before they are even born

Share article

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Email

Filed Under: Men’s Issues Tagged With: Chinese footbinding, Eran, Eran Sadeh, genital autonomy, inatactivism, Jewish, unnecessary male circumcision

  • Lisa M. Squier

    When my eldest (I have five sons) was born, I was 18. I was told he HAD to be circumcized. This was in North Carolina, USA. Well, I had him circumcised because I didn’t know any better. And spent his entire healing period crying every time it was time to change him, because HE was crying from pain.
    My second through fifth sons, I did NOT circumcise at birth. I left them intact. My fourth son had to have surgery (circumcision) at the age of two, but that was because the skin had not separated properly and he wasn’t able to urinate. So that left three intact.
    The other three decided to have themselves circumcised, but that was after they were grown up. It was entirely THEIR decision at that point, and I was glad it was. At least I had not forced MY decision on them. I don’t believe that there is a deity that requires you to mutilate yourself or those you love in order to be acceptable. I do not believe that there is a hygenic reason to mutilate yourself or others these days. I believe that we should leave both our males AND our females alone, and let them modify their own bodies as THEY choose to once THEY are ADULTS.
    Thank you for your article. It is indeed like the practice of foot-binding, and I hope the method of stopping it works as well as it did for foot binding.

    • Jonathon Conte

      Lisa Squier,

      The male foreskin is fused to the glans (head) of the penis by a thin membrane (the balano-preputial lamina) at birth because the genitals are not fully developed. This membrane will dissolve naturally over time but the amount of time that it takes varies with each individual. Likewise, the opening at the tip of the foreskin (the preputial sphincter) is very small when boys are young and thus prevents contaminants from entering the urethra. As one grows older, the preputial sphincter will continue to develop so that it will eventually be large enough to be retracted back over the glans.

      Forcefully retracting the foreskin of a boy might cause tears, bleeding, infection, and scar tissue. If scar tissue forms, it could cause problems with foreskin retraction later in life because scar tissue is not as elastic as normal penile skin. Therefore, a boy’s foreskin should NEVER be retracted by someone else: Not for diaper changes, bath time, a doctor’s check up, etc. Doing so is painful for the boy and can result in permanent damage to his body. The first person to retract a boy’s foreskin should be the boy himself.

      The average age when a boy can retract his foreskin is about 10 years old. Half of boys require even more time for their bodies to develop enough for them to be able to retract their foreskin. Therefore, a phimosis diagnosis for an individual 2 years of age is at best erroneous and at worst fraudulent.

      Here are some resources that provide additional information:
      • Forced Foreskin Retraction
      • How to Care for Your Intact Son
      • Answers To Your Questions About Premature (Forcible) Retraction of Your Young Son’s Foreskin

      • Lisa M. Squier

        Jonathon Conte ,
        It’s nice of you to say so, but truth is truth. I didn’t retract my son’s foreskin, forcibly or otherwise. When it wouldn’t go back EASILY, I left it alone and talked to his pediatrician about it, who recommended leaving it alone. So I did. It was only when it interfered with my son’s ability to urinate (ever hear a two year old scream because he can’t pee and it HURTS???) that I took him to a specialist and that was the diagnosis I was given. And guess what? They did the surgery, and he was able to pee again!
        I guess the message here would be, don’t assume you know something unless you really do. I was not one to mess about with my sons’ genitalia, other than bathing them till they learned how to bathe themselves (and was I glad when they had THAT figured out!). My son had an honest medical condition (else I would NEVER have put him through that pain at ANY age!), and I made the decision to ease the medical situation. Otherwise, as with the other three, I would have left him to make the decision on his own after he’d grown up.

        • PJ

          In my country they would try frenuloplasty or preputioplasty before circumcision

  • Jamie

    I’m glad to see Jews, especially Jewish men, speaking out against circumcision since Judaism is the primary reason for keeping circumcision of male children legal. I hope I’m still around to witness Judaism in practice sans circumcision (and metzitzah b’peh).

  • cosmopolite

    I admire Eran Sadeh, and I value this post. I especially value his honesty in revealing that a very powerful emotional driver behind infant circumcision is parental fear that if they don’t do it, their son’s penis will look weird, and having a weird penis is assumed to be a major social disability, even to the point of making eventual marriage difficult. I believe that infant circumcision is a psychosexual problem grounded in crass conformity.
    But there is an unstated irony. RIC has made headway in China, especially for boys born in the urban maternity wards. China does not have socialised medicine. The income of a doctor consists of fees charged for services performed, as is the case in the USA. Chinese obgyns offer to do RIC to boys, on the grounds that it is “cleaner” and “more modern”. Doting parents who want the “best” for their son often fall for this. The Chinese are not a bizarre aberration here. South Korean parents began having their boys circumcised in the 1960s. It is strongly suspected that South Korean adopted circumcision out of admiration for American practice. I would not be surprised if a desire to emulate USA practice is a factor at work in China.
    What China, the USA and Korea all have in common is ignorance of the detailed mechanics of sex. To believe that circumcision is harmless, one has to have a simplistic understanding of sexual acts and pleasure. I submit that intactivists using social media have materially advanced the human understanding of male masturbation, foreplay and penetrative sex. The main but unspoken reason for why intactivists and the American medical profession have agreed to disagree, is a lack of a common understanding of the mechanics of sex. When intactivist thinking about sex percolates to China, RIC will decline there.

InsideMAN is committed to pioneering conversations about men, manhood and masculinity that make a difference. We aim to create spaces where the voices of men, from many different backgrounds, can be heard. It’s time to have a new conversation about men. We'd love you to be a part of it.

insideNAN cover image  

Buy the insideMAN book here

Be first to get the latest posts from insideMAN

To have new articles delivered direct to your inbox, add your name and email address below.

Latest Tweets

  • Why Abused By My Girlfriend was a watershed moment for male victims of domestic abuse and society @ManKindInit… https://t.co/YyOkTSiWih

    3 weeks ago
  • Thanks

    5 months ago
  • @LKMco @MBCoalition @KantarPublic Really interesting.

    5 months ago

Latest Facebook Posts

Unable to display Facebook posts.
Show error

Error: Error validating application. Application has been deleted.
Type: OAuthException
Code: 190
Please refer to our Error Message Reference.

Copyright © 2019 · Metro Pro Theme on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in

loading Cancel
Post was not sent - check your email addresses!
Email check failed, please try again
Sorry, your blog cannot share posts by email.