insideMAN

  • Who we are
  • Men’s Insights
  • Men’s Issues
  • Men’s Interests
  • About Men

It’s great the Evening Standard is campaigning to support homeless veterans, but why is it hiding the fact nearly all of them are men?

December 18, 2014 by Inside MAN Leave a Comment

In November London’s Evening Standard newspaper launched a high-profile Christmas campaign to raise funds to support homeless veterans. The campaign has received cross-party support, including a pledge of £3m from Chancellor George Osborne.

All of this is great news – no-one should find themselves on the streets, but it is a particular travesty if someone who has risked their life fighting for their country is cast adrift by the society they fought to protect.

But what’s glaring about the Standard’s campaign and all of the quotes by party leaders in support of it, is the refusal to acknowledge the highly gendered nature of both homelessness and military sacrifice.

Homeless veterans ‘overwhelmingly male’

In London, nearly 90% of people who sleep on the streets are men. Of UK casualties in Iraq and Afghanistan, 99% of deaths were men, many of them teenagers.

One of the charities supported by the appeal told insideMAN that the veterans they work with are “overwhelmingly male”, before hazarding a guess that 90% of the people who seek help from them are men.

Despite these stark figures, the Evening Standard has made no mention of them in the numerous reports to promote its campaign, or even referred to the fact that men are those who are overwhelmingly those in need of its support.

Instead, both the language of the campaign and that of the quotes of party leaders in support of it, has been determinedly and consciously gender neutral.

Why do we ignore male disadvantage?

Of course the sacrifice and suffering of all veterans should be recognised, irrespective of gender, but to pretend – as the Standard’s campaign appears to – that such a glaring gender disparity simply doesn’t exist, amounts to a distortion of the truth.

The obvious question is, would the campaign and its supporters refuse to acknowledge there was any gendered disadvantage at play if 90% of homeless veterans were women? Far from it – the gender of those hardest hit would be the most important issue of all.

The question is then, why should disadvantage experienced primarily by women be seen as a gendered injustice that demands special attention; yet gendered disadvantage experienced primarily by men, not be acknowledged at all?

Picture: Kool Cats Photography

If you liked this article and want to read more, follow us on Twitter @insideMANmag and Facebook

Share article

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Email

Filed Under: Men’s Issues Tagged With: homeless veterans, male homelessness, male rough sleepers, rough sleeping, Veterans

InsideMAN is committed to pioneering conversations about men, manhood and masculinity that make a difference. We aim to create spaces where the voices of men, from many different backgrounds, can be heard. It’s time to have a new conversation about men. We'd love you to be a part of it.

insideNAN cover image  

Buy the insideMAN book here

Be first to get the latest posts from insideMAN

To have new articles delivered direct to your inbox, add your name and email address below.

Latest Tweets

  • Why Abused By My Girlfriend was a watershed moment for male victims of domestic abuse and society @ManKindInit… https://t.co/YyOkTSiWih

    3 weeks ago
  • Thanks

    5 months ago
  • @LKMco @MBCoalition @KantarPublic Really interesting.

    5 months ago

Latest Facebook Posts

Unable to display Facebook posts.
Show error

Error: Error validating application. Application has been deleted.
Type: OAuthException
Code: 190
Please refer to our Error Message Reference.

Copyright © 2019 · Metro Pro Theme on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in

loading Cancel
Post was not sent - check your email addresses!
Email check failed, please try again
Sorry, your blog cannot share posts by email.