insideMAN

  • Who we are
  • Men’s Insights
  • Men’s Issues
  • Men’s Interests
  • About Men

10 reasons more male graduates end up jobless

July 4, 2014 by Inside MAN 4 Comments

 

This week we reported that male graduates are 60% more likely to be unemployed than female graduates (up from 50% last year). The most interesting thing about this story is that there is no agreed reason as to why this is happening, so we’ve been canvassing opinions all week and come up with a list of 10 possible reasons.

1. Men are less employable because they take the wrong degrees

This is a common suggestion and it’s certainly true that you are more likely to be unemployed if you study medicine than if you take a media studies degree. However, when you drill down into the data you quickly discover that male graduates in nearly all subject areas are more likely to be unemployed than their female counterparts. So while me men who take media studies are certainly more likely to be unemployed than men who take medicine and dentistry; male media studies graduates are 40% more likely to be jobless than female media studies graduates and male medicine and dentistry graduates are 50% more likely to be jobless than female medicine and dentistry graduates. The only significant exception to this rule is agricultural studies, where female graduates are 14% more likely to be jobless.

2. Gentlemen prefer a life of leisure

Proponents of preference theory argue that gender differences in areas such as the gender pay gap are caused not by external forces, like systemic or cultural discrimination, but by internal forces such as our personal preferences. Preference theorists believe that the main reason women earn less is that they prefer to work part-time or prioritize their family.

According to Trefor Lloyd at the Boys Development Project: “The gap between female and male graduates has existed for some while, and says more about male graduate attitudes towards the workplace than the workplace itself.” If Trefor is correct, then the higher rates of unemployment amongst male graduates could be down to psychological factors like personal preference and attitudes towards work.

3 Men lack the necessary social skills to get a good job

Several people suggested that male graduates may lack the relevant skills to perform as well as women in an interview. One insideMAN reader, Daniel Dewey, said: “Men in general have much of their competitive drive removed by the current education system. It makes female graduates who are more complete and sure of themselves than male graduates. That is an important air to have in the interview process.”

Trefor Lloyd at the Boys Development Project agrees with the theory that women may perform better at interviews. He told us: “There is research that suggests that more young women than men possess the softer ‘people skills’ which employers are looking for and certainly at interview. Often young women interview better and have more basic work skills (punctuality, and ability to take an instruction).”

4 Positive discrimination in favour of women

Some people believe that male graduates are the victims of positive discrimination in favour of women. Their theory is that as more employers seek to increase the numbers of women they employ in pursuit of gender quotas, the more male graduates get squeezed out of the picture.

One of our followers on Facebook said: “We are moving away from meritocratic appointment and sliding towards some form of corporate Marxism in which good people go to waste and jobs are allocated on arbitrary demographic. This equality push towards more female employees is creating a greater number of male unemployed. We’ve created a monster potentially.”

5 Discrimination against women

Some people think than men are the secondary victims of sexism against women. As one male reader commented on Facebook: “male bosses hire attractive females to perv on”. Could male graduates really missing out on job opportunities because sexist male bosses have replace the motto “jobs for the boys” with a new catchprase—“jobs for the sexy girls”?

6 It’s the gender pay gap stupid

This is an interesting suggestion from the comments section of insideMan from Anne Dyster who said: “Even in this day and age there is a tendency to pay women less than men for the same job. If women are “cheaper” they are more likely to be employed.”

We’re not convinced that this is true as most evidence on the gender pay gap suggests that it isn’t caused by men being paid more for the same job, but by men working in higher paid jobs and investing more hours in their career lives.

7 It’s discrimination against men

When the statistics about male graduate unemployment were posted on Men’s Rights forums we were offered a number of theories which included: “positive discrimination, gynocentrism, male disposability”; “social engineering”; “making males more disposable/irrelevant” and “pandering to women and ****ing over EVERYONE else”.

8 The End of Men

According to Hanna Rosin, the author of the book The End of Men, women are getting the edge over men in the workplace because of the growth of “white collar” industries. Writing in the Atlantic in 201 she said: “A white-collar economy values raw intellectual horsepower, which men and women have in equal amounts. It also requires communication skills and social intelligence, areas in which women, according to many studies, have a slight edge. Perhaps most important—for better or worse—it increasingly requires formal education credentials, which women are more prone to acquire”.

Trefor Lloyd of the Boys Development Project suggests that some employers may make assumptions that men don’t have the right skills, simply because they are men. He told us: “There is a suggestion that employers can be quite stereotyped about young men NOT having these skills as well.”

9 Are men avoiding the bottom of the male hierarchy

In a world where the majority of primary breadwinners are still male and women still rank ambition and financial success as two of the key traits they look for in partners, male graduates may feel they have a long way to climb when they enter the job market. As well as being more likely to be unemployed, male graduates who are in work are also more likely to earn higher salaries than their female counterparts. This means there is a far more pronounced hierarchy of earnings for men than for women. Could it be that male graduates are more likely to be unemployed because they are hanging out for a better paid job or avoiding the pressure of having to scale the male breadwinner hierarchy all together.

According to Trefor Lloyd of the Boys Development Project: ‘There is research evidence that says many young women leave university and go into the workplace with an attitude that once you are in a job you can move around. So they take jobs often below their qualification level. In contrast many young men think ‘I have been studying for 3 or 4 years, so I am not going to work unless I am paid £30K’. The result is that that they come in at the same level as young women, but on average 6 months later.”

10 We are blind to the problems that men face

Whatever the cause of the higher levels of male graduate unemployment, part of the problem is that we are blind to the problems facing men and boys. If female graduates were more likely to be unemployed we would expect the problem to be highlighted and yet seem blind to such issues when they affect men. As insideMAN reader, Daniel Dewey said: “There is a dearth of support groups, assistance, and tailoring to men throughout education and government, and I think that shows when all else is held equal.”

Mary Curnock Cook, Chief Executive of UCAS agrees with Daniel that we need to pay more attention to the needs of young men in education. She told insideMAN that the stubborn gap between men and women in education could eclipse the gap between rich and poor within a decade. “Young men are becoming a disadvantaged group in terms of going to university,” she said “and this underperformance needs urgent focus across the education sector.”

For more on this story see Ken Harland and Sam McCready, from the Centre for Young Men’s Studies analysis here: So, why ARE male graduates more likely to be unemployed? 

Why do you think male graduates are more likely to be unemployed than their female counterparts? Do you agree with any of the 10 theories above or do you have your own ideas. Either way we’d love to hear your thoughts on this subject, so if you have a theory then please leave a comment below this article.

—Photo Credit: flickr/bensonk42

Share article

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Email

Filed Under: Men’s Issues Tagged With: Boys Development Project, gender education gap, graduate unemployment, male graduates, Mary Curnock Cook, Trefor Lloyd, UCAS

So, why ARE male graduates more likely to be unemployed?

July 4, 2014 by Inside MAN 1 Comment

 

By Ken Harland and Sam McCready, co-directors of the Centre for Young Men’s Studies at the University of Ulster

On Tuesday we reported on new figures showing that in addition to the fact that young men are less likely to go to university than young women, when they graduate, they are also more likely to be unemployed. Here two experts in young men’s development talk exclusively to insideMAN about why.

Reasons for gender differences throughout all levels of education are hotly debated and contested.  However, once again we see concerning trends about (young) men and education with the Higher Education Statistics Agency (HESA) showing male graduates are now 60% more likely to end up unemployed six months after graduating than female graduates.

We know that factors impacting upon educational underachievement are complex and must be considered within a wider context of socio-economic issues such as poverty, class, ethnicity, social disadvantage, a declining industrial base and less demand for traditional male jobs.

However, the socio-economic background of graduates is undoubtedly an important consideration in regard to gender, particularly as universities are increasingly targeting those from low participation neighbourhoods in an attempt to widen access and participation in higher education.

What do employers want?

What is unclear from the report is the specific classifications of female and male graduates.  If, for example, females typically attain higher classifications, then a natural conclusion would be that females could have an educational advantage going into interviews.

But we know that in order to successfully gain employment an individual will need more than a high degree classification or other academic qualifications. Increasingly employers look for personal qualities, leadership potential, emotional intelligence, effective communication skills and the ability to work as part of a team.

It could perhaps be further hypothesised that females prepare more thoroughly for interviews and present themselves better than males to interview panels.  It could also be the case that females have higher expectations and ambitions about employment than men.  While these are important considerations, and more research is needed, it is likely that there are deeper and more complex underlying issues in higher education that merit further gender analysis.

‘Pressures of becoming a man’

In our own longitudinal study in Northern Ireland post-primary schools ‘Taking Boys Seriously’ there was a significant lowering of aspirations amongst boys from the age of fourteen, particularly those from areas of high socio-economic deprivation.  These boys believed that even if they did well in school and went to university they were unlikely to ‘get a good job.’  This ‘dawning of a reality’ in regard to future employment opportunities was in contrast to their stereotypical masculine expectations.

Appreciating complexities within the construction of working class masculinities is pivotal to understanding internal pressures that many males feel regarding their sense of identity and what it means to be a man.

Within many working class communities notions of men, education and work remain cemented within traditional male gender roles such as ‘provider and protector.’  Noticeably in the ‘Taking Boys Seriously’ study, there appeared to be little in place to support boys that helped them to explore, reflect and develop a critical understanding of masculinity or what it means to be a man.

What are the answers?

Boys also spoke of a lack of preparedness in making crucial life choices at 14 and 16 in regard to GCSE and A Level selection.   They were concerned about how making the wrong subject choices would impact negatively upon their future employment opportunities and the type of skills and knowledge they would need in preparation for the workplace.  The issues underpinning GCSE concerns for boys in our study were:

  • a perceived lack of a social life while preparing for GCSE’s
  • lack of clarity about the benefits of education for boys
  • concerns about university debt for achievers
  • no immediate perceived gratification or incentives for those who are underachieving

These were all identified as stressors that caused apathy and reduced the value that certain boys placed on education.  Concurrent with ‘pressures and stresses’ of pre GCSEs, is the period in a boy’s life when he may be struggling or coming to terms with his masculine identity and contradictions in regard to what he thinks it means to be a man in modern society.

One note of caution we would add, is the need to look at the issue of trends in education in its entirety and not fall into the trap that we need to close the gap between male and female graduates and employment – educational gaps between boys and girls are clearly happening from a very early age.

This is not to say that young females do not face difficulties in regard to their education, life experiences, life choices and future employment opportunities – clearly they do.

The key point we would make is that despite much debate into gender within all levels of education, there still appears to be a lack of clarity about exactly what are the key issues in regard to gender differences in educational attainment and employment trends between men and women.

For the full report on Taking Boys Seriously see:

http://www.deni.gov.uk/taking_boys_seriously_final.docx.pdf

For more on this story see our article: 10 reasons more male graduates end up jobless 

Photo courtesy: HelenCobain license here

Share article

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Email

Filed Under: Men’s Issues Tagged With: Centre for Young Men’s Studies, gender education gap, graduate unemployment, Ken Harland, male graduates, Sam McCready, University of Ulster

InsideMAN is committed to pioneering conversations about men, manhood and masculinity that make a difference. We aim to create spaces where the voices of men, from many different backgrounds, can be heard. It’s time to have a new conversation about men. We'd love you to be a part of it.

insideNAN cover image  

Buy the insideMAN book here

Be first to get the latest posts from insideMAN

To have new articles delivered direct to your inbox, add your name and email address below.

Latest Tweets

  • Why Abused By My Girlfriend was a watershed moment for male victims of domestic abuse and society @ManKindInit… https://t.co/YyOkTSiWih

    3 weeks ago
  • Thanks

    5 months ago
  • @LKMco @MBCoalition @KantarPublic Really interesting.

    5 months ago

Latest Facebook Posts

Unable to display Facebook posts.
Show error

Error: Error validating application. Application has been deleted.
Type: OAuthException
Code: 190
Please refer to our Error Message Reference.

Copyright © 2019 · Metro Pro Theme on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in

loading Cancel
Post was not sent - check your email addresses!
Email check failed, please try again
Sorry, your blog cannot share posts by email.