insideMAN

  • Who we are
  • Men’s Insights
  • Men’s Issues
  • Men’s Interests
  • About Men

Lads, its time for some meninism

October 27, 2014 by Inside MAN 8 Comments

If women have got feminism what have men got? George Gillett says that men could do with some kind of “menimism” to liberate us from the narrow expectations of masculine stereotypes.

—This is article #18 in our series of #100Voices4Men and boys 

Feminist movements are thriving, reacting to an increasingly misogynistic society in which gender stereotyping is commonplace. And rightly so; individuals shouldn’t be limited by presumptions and attitudes towards their gender, and many men have realised this, now becoming an important part of the feminist movement. Yet male concerns about gender stereotyping shouldn’t stop at liberation for women – strict gender norms can affect men in equally damaging ways. Perhaps a new movement is needed to confront the oppression men face, to coin a term; ‘meninism’.

Society is inflicting gender roles on both men and women. Routinely, women face critique of their appearance, pressure to start family life and expectations to occupy a generally subordinate role to men. Fortunately, feminism’s great work is confronting these sexist attitudes. Men face similar narrow conceptions on how they should behave; an expectation to be ambitious, to provide for a family financially but not affectionately and to hide their emotions. The difference is that men still lack a voice.W

Is it any wonder than more men kill themselves?

Consider mental illness, and how we deal with emotion. While women are encouraged to ‘open up’ and discuss issues with friends, men are told to ‘man up,’ and to hide their emotions. According to the mental health charity Mind, the consequence of this is that men ‘are often discouraged from expressing ‘softer’ emotions’ leading to ‘barriers to good mental health’. Mind also suggests that the public are ‘more prejudiced against men with mental health problems than women.’ Considering the difficulties that gender stereotyping presents to men, the statistic that men are 3-4 times more likely to commit suicide than women no longer seems so surprising.

Men also face social pressure in attitudes towards their career and family. To be fully male is to act as the breadwinner of the family and so to be anything other than financially ambitious is scorned. This burden leads to disparities in the attitudes of men and women towards their career, with men all too often feeling inadequate or worthless if they are not traditionally earning enough to ‘provide’ for their family. Indeed,reports show that men are disproportionately more affected psychologically as a result of unemployment in comparison with women.

And it goes beyond losing a job. A recent survey revealed that 82% of fathers want to spend more time with their families than their job allows, highlighting how society’s gendered expectations are failing both men and women. Thankfully the situation is changing – a growing number of men are staying at home to look after children, but fathers still make up only 10% of stay-at-home parents. It is clear that more needs to be done if men are to be free to choose a lifestyle which is best for them.

Body image – often understood as the preserve of women – also plays an integral role in how men identify with their gender. We are told men should be fit and strong – a sentiment that tries to label some men as less ‘masculine’ than others. This attitude has real consequences – one survey revealed that 63% of men expressed worries that ‘they were not muscular enough’. These fears arise from the absurd belief that ‘real men’ are strong and have a particular body shape, another sign that gender stereotypes in media and advertising are causing men harm.

Warped perceptions of masculinity don’t help anyone

Gender stereotypes even encroach on our most intimate relationships. A warped perception of masculinity has led to bizarre attitudes towards sexual orientation and the widespread belief that there is something ‘unmanly’ about being gay. Being a real, fully-functioning man is synonymous with being in a sexual relationship with a woman for no reason other than prejudice. The result of this is that male members of the LGBTQ community are perceived as unmanly or effeminate. Perhaps the most obvious consequence of this is the discrimination shown towards the LGBTQ community; 99% of school students regularly hear homophobic language being used and 41% of gay people have considered committing suicide as a result of bullying. Is this really a surprise considering the societal attitudes that rip away someone’s whole gender identity as soon as they identify as anything that isn’t heterosexual?

Likewise, for heterosexual men, our society’s lad culture dictates how individuals must act in order to be ‘real men’ – just read the routine misogynistic banter from websites such as Uni Lad. Men are seen as abnormal if they refuse to ‘rate’ girls out of ten, and face accusations of ‘being whipped’ if they become too caring or considerate. There is apparently something weird about not laughing along to a joke about sexual assault, or not gawping at girls in the street.

However, lad culture is not the sole culprit of these damaging perceptions. Too many women blissfully propagate gender stereotypes in their day to day lives with seemingly harmless dating games such as playing hard to get reinforcing the idea that men must strive, chase and earn the ‘prize’ of a girlfriend. Not only do these gender roles aid the objectification of women but they lead to unhappiness for men who find themselves not fitting into the narrow conceptions of stereotypical gendered behaviour.

Patriarchy hurts men too

All of these issues have a common cause; the idea of masculinity and how we have defined what being a man is. Just as feminists point to the limitations of an effeminate personality, we must highlight the injustices of the inflexible masculine mould that we are expected to fill. It is not about granting men the freedom to adopt an effeminate personality if they wish, it’s about having the sense to realise that a gender can’t have a personality. That to tie someone’s physical sex to a personality trait is no less ridiculous than associating a personality trait to an ethnicity, sexual orientation or nationality.

You may think that ‘meninism’ is a ridiculous concept, especially when considering history. Women have suffered, and continue to suffer, from a patriarchal society which disproportionately grants privilege and power to men. But it seems clear that men suffer too. You may also argue that feminism already campaigns for men’s issues, yet groups regularly focus exclusively on the oppression of women. Visit the website for campaign group UK Feminista for instance, where every statistic exclusively highlights oppression against women. Of course, ideally, people of all sexes could unite in campaigns to end gender stereotyping. However, as long as feminists (very reasonably) exclusively focus on how gender stereotypes affect women, men shouldn’t be intimidated to discuss how gender stereotypes cause harm to us all.

We must remember what liberation means – it is not just equal opportunity to be financially independent or to hold positions of authority. Liberation is about much more – it’s the freedom to be yourself regardless of ethnicity, sexual orientation, class or gender. As soon as we assign stereotypes to any identity we create expectations of how individuals should behave, guidelines of what people should want, and most importantly, limitations on who we can be. This is as true for men as anyone else.

So let’s reclaim the words ‘man,’ ‘masculine’ and ‘lad’. Let’s dissociate them from misogyny, banter and an inability to discuss emotional problems. Let’s remember what these words should be used for – to describe the sex of a person. And only their sex.

This article was originally published on George Gillett’s blog, which can be found here. You can also follow him on Twitter @george_gillett.

—Picture credit: Flickr/Renato Ganoza

You can find all of the #100Voices4Men articles that will be published in the run up to International Men’s Day 2014 by clicking on this link—#100Voices4Men—and follow the discussion on twitter by searching for #100Voices4Men.

You can join the #100Voices4Men discussion by commenting below; by following us on Twitter @insideMANmag and Facebook or by emailing insideMANeditor@gmail.com. 

 

Share article

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Email

Filed Under: Men’s Insights Tagged With: #100Voices4Men, Feminism, George Gillett, meninism

  • Darren Ball

    Good article. I agree with everything but this:

    “However, as long as feminists (very reasonably) exclusively focus on how gender stereotypes affect women”.

    Why is it reasonable when feminism is supposed to be about gender equality and the end of patriarchy? It is divisive and make space for misogynistic movements.

  • http://JohnAllman.UK John Allman

    If “menimism” is a men’s movement based upon the ridiiulous belief that “patriarchy hurts men too”, include me out. I believe that patriarchy, a father’s role and authority within the nuclear family, benefits and (yes) liberates men, women and (above all) children and (because child-rearing is a gendered activity) especially little boys. I believe that a “feminism” that attacks patriarchy, attacks marriage and attacks the family, has been harming men, women and children alike.

    Forget “menimism”. Let’s go for masculism and have done with it, because we’re NOT misogynistic. like misandric feminists are.

  • Séan

    I agree that we need a “meninism”, and I think it’s up to men themselves to arrange this. I don’t have an issue with feminists not campaigning for mens issues, because at the end of the day, why should they? It’s not their problem, in the same way that global warming isn’t. I do however have a problem with the misandric element found among some feminists, for example jeering at the mere suggestion that men could be victims and refusing to acknowledge mens issues (e.g claiming women suffer predominantly from domestic violence, when studies have clearly shown that over 40% of victims are male.

    Overall though, it seems that many mens rights websites out there exist solely to criticize the feminist movement. I’m not saying this is wrong, I’m not saying this is right, but I will say that criticizing feminists will not help men. To help men, there needs to be more focus on publicizing issues that help men, and campaigning for these issues directly (e.g. campaigning for better mental health facilities, suicide awareness, mens health campaigns, fathers issues. People also need to start calling out any sexism against men in everyday life, as at the moment it seems to be acceptable.

  • Nigel

    Darren is correct that it is a a bankrupt position to suggest that feminism , which in any definition of itself I have heard or read claims to be about gender. Not just a union for women. This more important than just intellectual dishonesty. Because women are the main agents of socialisation in our society. As you rightly point out in this article women are on pole position in bringing up and teaching each generation . That “society” is transmitted largely by women. Clearly a union for women would have a vested interest in making sure males continue to be the means of production while they distribute the profits! But of course there aren’t classes defined by their genitals in a simplistic way. “Society”, societies, are a constant human effort to deal with frequently changing realities. Our own multicultural present in many cities presents a sort of laboratory of the diversity of social structures and constructions and the speed at which these evolve to deal with the realities encountered( not the least of which is encounters with other cultures). 
    As a final comment I would caution against seeing momentary “moral panics” about young people ” lads” being a latest one as anything more than just that; ephemeral and a panic. “Skinheads” “gender benders” ” punks” “chavs” “teen mothers” “girl gangs” “hoodies” and so on. Even to the bullington club all attesting to a regular clash between part of a younger generation and those clear they know better. Each heralds the end of civilised life and each is consigned to history quicly and imperceptibly as a new panic engulfs us. There is nothing more quickly forgotten than the recent past.
    As for the latest moral panics I suppose  I think it indicative that the fanciful soap operas  of bored ladies of the gentry from the 19th Century ( however skilfully written) are analysed as social history and Downton Abbey carries all before it. “Lads” it seems are a threat to this generation’s Bridget Jones, well at least this year. Where are all those aristocratic human rights lawyers Mr. D’Arcy’s ? 
    Of course many self proclaimed feminists have no interest in men’s issues. As many women from other cultures and classes have pointed out they don’t have much interest in many issues affecting women either! 

  • Nigel

    Sean. In as much as Feminism is an ideology or set of ideas or theory it is open to criticism by women and men. As is any other idea. For the most part the most persuasive criticisms I have read have been by women, in the field of Violence and abuse. Sadly this work tends not to get out into popular media. Though “honey badgers” is I believe for some entertaining women busy pointing out the holes in a flimsy theory!

  • aj

    The article starts badly by saying society is increasingly misogynistic. Where is the evidence of this? It seems to me that this is simply untrue. There are increasing levels of misandry. The article itself is misandric in blaming ‘the patriarchy’ the idea that there is a masculine cause to all societies ills.
    The reality is that in almost all areas men suffer gross discrimination. Education is an overwhelmingly female environment in which the assessment process was chosen to favour girls and in which there are many programs designed to assist girls preremtially but not boys despite boys lower achievement. Men spend three times longer in jail than women for the same offences and there is specific guidance to judges to treat women differently. Men die younger than women but more resources are spent on women’s health than men’s and even more on research. There is a willful concealment of male disadvantage by the media whether it is murders and killings in which only women and children are highlighted despite male deaths being far far more common, the exclusive focus on female disadvantage so the fact that men are more likely to be unemployed or are paid less than women for part time work or the domination of university education by women. There is an annual campaign to end violence against women but nothing to end the far more common violence against men. Feminists deny, cover up and obscure domestic violence against men by women.

    At a deep level as men we know and are constantly reminded that our lives are worth far less than women’s. There is a constant message of men, bad, violent disposable.

    Yes we should accept as I think almost all do that there is no single male identity but the main thing we have to reject is the demonisation and devaluing of men summarised in the idea of patriarchy.

  • Séan

    Nigel, I wasn’t saying that feminism shouldn’t be criticized, there are many aspects of it (especially the misandric element and failure to acknowledge issues faced by men; for example Sydney University have just refused to allow a Mens Shed open on campus as they claim it’s non inclusive) but I do think too much time is spent sometimes talking about feminism without achieving anything (not on this site, but on others) and that time could be better spent tackling the issues that directly affect men.

  • Nigel

    Sean. I do so agree that energy should be put into efforts to support men and boys where their situations can be improved.And frankly in many situations it’s as simple as just being thoughtful to offer support to men and boys at the same time as women and girls. 
    But over the years I must admit to having more time and respect for those also putting energy into combatting the ideology. I have seen so many modest well meant initiatives such as the men’s shed movement pounced on and trashed by people vociferously espousing a brand of feminism. Of course in Sydney it may have been beurocratic nonsense but it does remind me of so many good works undermined by by ideological driven groups and individuals. Sufficient for me now give much more credence to those bent on exposing the ideology. 

InsideMAN is committed to pioneering conversations about men, manhood and masculinity that make a difference. We aim to create spaces where the voices of men, from many different backgrounds, can be heard. It’s time to have a new conversation about men. We'd love you to be a part of it.

insideNAN cover image  

Buy the insideMAN book here

Be first to get the latest posts from insideMAN

To have new articles delivered direct to your inbox, add your name and email address below.

Latest Tweets

  • Why Abused By My Girlfriend was a watershed moment for male victims of domestic abuse and society @ManKindInit… https://t.co/YyOkTSiWih

    3 weeks ago
  • Thanks

    5 months ago
  • @LKMco @MBCoalition @KantarPublic Really interesting.

    5 months ago

Latest Facebook Posts

Unable to display Facebook posts.
Show error

Error: Error validating application. Application has been deleted.
Type: OAuthException
Code: 190
Please refer to our Error Message Reference.

Copyright © 2019 · Metro Pro Theme on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in

loading Cancel
Post was not sent - check your email addresses!
Email check failed, please try again
Sorry, your blog cannot share posts by email.